27 State Ags Back Women’s Sports Defense in Supreme Court Trans Athlete Cases

NEWYou can now listen to Pakinomist articles!

EXCLUSIVE: Lawyers from 27 states and the US territory in Guam have signed Amicus threats to support the defense in an upcoming Supreme Court case to protect women’s sports from a transgender athlete clutter.

In July, the Supreme Court agreed to review state ban on transient athletes participating in public school sports. The two cases it will hear, Little vs. Hecox in Idaho and BPJ vs. West Virginia, focused on state laws that prevent biological men from competing for girls and women’s sports teams.

The applicants in the cases, transient athletes, tried to circumvent these laws while the defendant, state authorities in West Virginia and Idaho, are trying to maintain the laws.

CLICK HERE for more sports cover on Foxnews

Now Ags from Arkansas, Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Tennesse, Tenness, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennesse, Tennesse, Pennsylvania Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wyoming and the American Territory in Guam, all their support behind the defendants, as seen in copies of the briefs obtained by Pakinomist.

Ags from Idaho and West Virginia only signed the panties of the case that are not based in their state as they are already an accused in the case within their state.

“In the heart of these cases is a fundamental question: Can states maintain laws that retain justice and opportunities for female athletes Fox news of preserving.

“We need to protect these opportunities because law, science and the public will be on our side. We think the court will be too.”

Inside the Gavin Newsoms transcent volleyball crisis

West Virginia, who adopted the “Save Women’s Sports Act” in 2021, appeals to a lower court decision that allowed transking athlete Becky Pepper-Jackson to compete at the school’s cross country skiing and track teams. Last year, Pepper-Jackson qualified for West Virginia Girls High School State Track Meet, which finished in third place in the Discus-Kastet and eighth in the shot put in class AAA division.

The fourth US Appeal Court of Appeals gave the benefit of Pepper-Jackson, who has taken puberty-blocking medicine in a April 2024 decision based on the straight protective clause of the constitution.

Idaho, who became the first state of the country to ban transnry athletes from girls and women’s sports in 2020, asked the Supreme Court to hear his case involving Lindsay Hecox, a trans athlete who wants to compete for Boise State’s Women’s Baneteam.

A 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals Panel maintained an injunction that blocked Idaho State Law in 2023.

HECOX asked the Supreme Court earlier this month to drive its challenge against the Idaho State Act.

“While it is important to play women’s sports for Mrs. Hecox, her highest priority is trained from college and lives a healthy and safe life,” a Filing from Hecox’s lawyers read. “MS. HECOX has therefore decided to permanently withdraw and refrain from playing women’s sports at BSU or in Idaho covered by HB 500.”

Meanwhile, Idaho -Rets Attorney Raul Labrador Hope for the Supreme Court to make a decision with a wider influence than just to have a state implement its own specific law on the issue. He wants a new national precedent. “I think that’s what they have to do,” Labrador told Pakinomist Digital in an exclusive interview.

“I think they will have a great decision on whether men can participate in women’s sports, and more importantly how to decide whether trans -bright individuals are protected by the federal constitutions and state and federal laws.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top