- Financial and technical posts show the highest AI adoption among LinkedIn content creators
- Mid-level professionals are using AI more to maintain visibility and career growth
- Senior managers rely on AI to manage high communication output effectively
The advent of AI tools has changed how professionals communicate on LinkedIn, creating a remarkable increase in automated content across multiple industries.
A new Publicate study of nearly 1,000 submissions, sectors reliant on rapid output and data-driven workflows show the highest incorporation of AI-generated material.
Finance leads with 73.8% of posts reflecting the use of artificial intelligence, while technology follows with 57.8% and legal with 54.7%.
Seniority patterns clearly reveal pressure
Industries built on trust and personal interaction, such as healthcare and human resources, maintain a lower level of AI dependence.
In healthcare, 45.8% of posts show AI input, while human resources reports 39.7%, reflecting a cautious approach to automation.
Analysis by career stage shows that mid-level professionals are the most active users of AI tools, with adoption rates of 54.42%, reflecting the need to maintain visibility, demonstrate expertise and demonstrate career advancement in increasingly competitive environments.
Senior managers follow close behind at 53.61%, with a large proportion using artificial intelligence to effectively meet the demands of high communication output.
Entry-level staff at 52.17% also show heavy reliance on AI, compensating for limited experience or uncertainty when producing polished posts.
In contrast, senior (46.42%) and junior (45.00%) professionals show relatively lower consumption.
This suggests either a preference for creating personal content or greater reliance on internal communication channels over public posts.
Sectors such as construction and education show moderate levels of AI use, reflecting a balance between traditional communication methods and selective automation.
In these industries, posts often contain summaries of project updates, research findings, or instructional content, while narrative or reflective posts remain largely human-authored.
Content type affects AI engagement. Posts that convey structured information, such as data insights, trends or technical updates, are more often created with AI support.
In contrast, content that focuses on personal experience, mentoring or guidance tends to be authored without automation.
There are also variations within sectors. Even in industries with higher overall adoption, some posts maintain a narrative or conversational style, and content aimed at sharing industry updates or professional insights with a wider network shows a higher degree of AI involvement.
Posts written for internal discussion, professional reflection, or relationship-focused communication tend to rely more on human authorship.
Industries with structured processes or tasks that generate measurable outputs also tend to integrate AI more often.
Conversely, sectors where interpersonal skills, advisory roles or trust-based interactions are central show more limited AI involvement.
“AI has become the new professional assistant,” said Chris Bradley, founder at Publicate.
“But as automation becomes more common, there is a growing question of whether efficiency is starting to outweigh authenticity.”
Companies and job sites increasingly recognize the efficiency AI brings, but they also face challenges in assessing the credibility of automated content.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews and opinions in your feeds. Be sure to click the Follow button!
And of course you can too follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, video unboxings, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp also.
