- AMD Ryzen AI Halo is powered by AMD’s 16-Core ‘Zen 5’-based Ryzen AI Max+ 395
- It also offers 128GB of total memory, matching the Nvidia DGX Spark
- With an advertised MSRP of $3999, it aims to challenge both Nvidia’s offerings and solutions that currently rely on a high-end Apple Mac Mini for localized AI
AMD is finally ready to release its Ryzen AI Halo, a compact full-stack AI development offering that aims to compete directly with Nvidia’s DGX platform and Apple’s Mac Mini.
The platform offers a memory configuration similar to the previous one and allows developers to install Windows or Linux as their preferred operating system.
But AMD’s entry comes nearly two years after its competitors, which begs the question: is it too little, too late?
A relatively late entry?
The AMD Ryzen AI Halo Developer Platform was announced by CEO Dr. Lisa Su over 4 months ago during her CES keynote. It finally received a tentative release date, with pre-orders (exclusive to Microcenter in the US) beginning in June.
However, AMD’s answer to Nvidia’s dominance of the current AI developer market comes nearly 5 months after its announcement, even though other similarly configured enterprise-class options already exist to fill the void.
All eyes on the DGX Spark
AMD has not directly competed with Nvidia’s DGX Spark since its mid-October 2025 release, although it has tapped 3rd party industrial partners such as HP (Z2 Mini G1a) and Minisforum (MS-S1 Max) to fill the void.
Despite the late launch, Ryzen AI Halo aims to level the playing field for Team Red against Nvidia’s deeply entrenched and formidable offering.
While AMD’s own slides show a slight lead when it comes to certain AI models, with leads ranging from 4% to 14% in terms of token generation, while touting support for Windows, a lower power cost per token generated for leading LLMs and an NPU under the hood, things are considerably closer than one would like, all things considered.
Hardware Overview: Ryzen AI Halo vs DGX Spark
AMD’s built-in AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has a TDP of 120W vs. Nvidia GB10 onboard the Spark (140W), although both devices come with a 240W PSU to cover the overhead of their motherboards, SSDs and cooling.
Both have the same amount of RAM available to users (128 GB), and while AMD’s offering comes with Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 (like the DGX Spark), it only offers a 10 GbE ethernet port compared to Nvidia’s ConnectX NIC, which offers up to 200 Gbps speeds, making it ideal for users to work with DGX Spark’s 2 and DGX parameters. AMD’s offer.
The DGX Spark also holds its own against AMD’s offerings in terms of raw computing, delivering up to 1 petaFLOP of FP4 computing compared to AMD’s announced 60 TFLOPs of FP16. It also offers a 4TB configuration at a spot price of $4700, doubling the storage that AMD currently offers.
Physically, the Ryzen AI Halo is slightly smaller than the DGX Spark, although both devices externalize their power supply requirements to maintain their respective form factors.
A little late?
One could argue that the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 that Ryzen AI Halo currently offers is a bit underwhelming for a release this late in the game.
HP has already shipped the Z2 Mini G1a to most of its enterprise-class customers, offering a similar configuration: 128GB of total memory, the same APU and 2TB of storage, albeit in a much larger form factor than what AMD currently offers.
Despite this, AMD’s offering aims to expand the options for users who were previously looking for a smaller form factor, access to a validated technology stack, or simply the ability to purchase a solution with wider support than similar off-the-shelf offerings.
However, one thing is clear for users who want to run CUDA applications or larger models (> 200B parameters): Nvidia’s DGX Spark and its superior networking still provide formidable power that AMD has yet to provide an alternative to, at least in this form factor.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews and opinions in your feeds.
