- Bipartisan law would have big tech companies pay for the extra energy use and capacity fueled by data centers and AI demand
- Congress will begin consideration of the bill before it moves forward
- Electricity prices have risen dramatically in the US, primarily due to an explosion in new data center construction projects
A bipartisan bill is currently making its way through Congress that seeks to force the big tech companies behind the massive build-out of AI data centers to pay for the energy they use.
Currently, energy costs are calculated by a combination of factors such as how much it costs to generate and transport the power, with extra charges added for plant and infrastructure maintenance, local regulations and additional capacity and demand charges.
This means that those who live in areas with data centers connected to the local grid must bear the cost of the sudden increase in demand and capacity, even if they do not use more energy themselves. The Ratepayer Protection Act appears to shift this burden onto the technology companies.
Taxpayer Protection Act
The name might sound familiar, and that’s because the bill appears to essentially codify parts of Trump’s Ratepayer Protection Pledge — the commitment that companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Oracle, and xAI signed back in March of this year. However, this pledge was only voluntary and lacked any real details of exactly what the signatories would pay for.
The House of Representatives will now begin consideration of the bill, which seeks to introduce a “large load standard” that would require technology companies to shoulder the costs of the energy they use, along with upgrades to the local grids they connect to. The bipartisan bill’s primary sponsors are Reps. Gabe Evans, R-Colo., and Kathy Castor, D-Fla.
“Families and small businesses across the country should not be left to foot the bill for these new developments, even though the benefits of these innovations will be felt by the entire community,” said House Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie, R-Ky. “The Ratepayer Protection Act is a bipartisan effort that would ensure that the cost of grid upgrades is appropriately paid according to demand.”
If you weren’t already aware, there has been a nationwide wave of opposition to data centers, with both local grassroots movements and nationwide opposition groups successfully delaying and canceling data center construction. There have been a number of motives behind the opposition, from ecological conservation and energy prices, to the fear of AI-influenced job losses and a modern resurgence of the Luddite movement.
The Ratepayer Protection Act is therefore a response to the growing anger felt across the political spectrum in the US, and represents one of the first attempts by Congress to force big tech to pay their way for the huge increase in energy demand the US has experienced in the last few years – primarily driven by AI demand.
On behalf of his constituents, bill sponsor Evans said, “Colorado families, farmers and small businesses should not be forced to cover the costs of new power generation fueled by this development.”
After passing through Congress, the bill must be considered by the Energy and Commerce Committee, the House and the Senate before being ratified by President Trump. Whether the bill will still have teeth during that time remains to be seen. But the bill comes at a crucial time in the U.S. election cycle, with midterm elections just months away and data centers a serious consideration for any incumbent or hopeful candidate.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews and opinions in your feeds.
