- James Cameron has warned that AI-generated actors are “horrifying” and threaten real performance
- The comment came after the release of fully digital actor Tilly Norwood
- The rise of AI artists has sparked backlash from SAG-AFTRA and Hollywood stars
James Cameron, a director synonymous with digital wizardry, has seen the future of filmmaking, and he wants no part of it. “Horrifying,” he called it during a recent interview on CBS. He wasn’t talking about killer robots or Titanic sequels — he meant generative AI, and specifically its growing capacity to generate entire actors from scratch.
“Now go to the other end of the spectrum,” Cameron said, contrasting his use of motion capture and CGI in Avatar with today’s AI trend, “and you have generative AI where they can make up a character. They can make up an actor. They can create a performance from scratch with a text prompt. It’s like, no. That’s horrifying to me.”
Cameron’s take on AI acting marks a clear departure from his usual techno-optimism. His discomfort is not with the computers themselves; it is the erasure of the human being at the center of art that troubles him. And for once he is not metaphorical.
At the heart of the industry’s current digital angst is Tilly Norwood, a photorealistic, AI-generated actress created by Eline Van der Velden’s company Particle6. Norwood was introduced in September at the Zurich Film Festival.
Although she has not starred in a film or even moved in front of a camera outside of digital mock-ups, she has received plenty of criticism from the film industry. The Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA) issued a scathing statement denouncing Norwood as a synthetic impersonator trained on the stolen work of real artists.
AI trading future
This is not just an actor’s union issue. It’s a question of authorship, of emotional trust. When you cry during a scene, part of you is reacting to the person behind the performance. If that person is replaced by an algorithm trained on thousands of micro-expressions, voice samples and motion clips, it may still work on screen, but what exactly are you connecting with?
Cameron’s warning resonates because he is far from a technophobe. He has spent decades blending human actors with sophisticated CGI systems The Terminator to Avatar, but the crucial difference, as he points out, is that motion capture preserves the human core. A server farm didn’t imagine Sigourney Weaver’s Na’vi face in Avatar; it was still her.
While Tilly Norwood may just be a stunt, it’s still a sign of what’s developing. When background actors can be scanned once and used forever, and studios negotiate the right to replicate voices and likenesses forever, the foundation for fully AI-led productions is already here.
For now, even the most groundbreaking deepfakes or digital doubles are typically paired with real actors to provide an emotional anchor. But give it time and you will see attempts to remove the human factor. Whether people will enjoy the resulting films is less certain.
Cameron unequivocally remains on Team Human. And while his discomfort can be read as romantic or even dramatic, it is not out of place. Because when AI-generated artists can pass for the real thing, viewers can stop asking who’s really behind the eyes. Before then, it won’t really matter. All that will be left is a story, told effectively by no one.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews and opinions in your feeds. Be sure to click the Follow button!
And of course you can too follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, video unboxings, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp also.
The best business laptops for all budgets
