Data portability is a common repeated promise of crypto. “Take your followers and social graphs over the internet.” “Bring your video game articles across games and platforms.” “Log in to any place with a single, overall identity.” These claims have enthusiastic builders and developers, but have not yet gone mainstream.
The latest platform changes have highlighted the fragility of our digital lives. With conversations about a potential tictok ban, creators are facing losing years of content and audience relationships overnight. Meanwhile, when US consumers embrace new AI models like Deepseek, built in China, they face similar questions about where their data lives and who might be able to access it.
These are the symptoms of a basic problem: Users do not really own or control their data. We live on rented land.
Many of today’s leading cryptoinvestors wrote about data portability and user rheumatoidity in the early days of web2. This vision of an internet – where users, not platforms, controlled their digital lives – was one of the driving forces behind crypto. While Crypto has succeeded in financial applications, this promise of portable data and a self -sleeping internet remains unfulfilled.
We have seen many attempts: NFTs let you bring objects across games, decentralized social networks such as Farcaster and Bluesky promising laptops and verifiable identity standards. No one has (yet) seen widespread adoption.
The reality? While early Internet thinkers are interested in the principles of data sovereignty, most users have a simpler question: What can I actually do with it?
Without AI, most data are only relevant within the fenced gardens on the platform it is on. With AI, it becomes a valued digital item and a tool to operate almost any application. Your message story helps AI understand your writing style, your preferences and your relationships. With many users storing their data in the self-logoer wallets, developers can build AI experiences that are truly personalized. AI finally provides “why” on data portability in the form of a better product experience rather than ideology alone.
There is still a cold starting problem. It is inconvenient for users to connect their data. And for developers, the mindset is today: If you convince users to upload their data to your platform, why would you make it easy for them to take it elsewhere? This creates a cycle where each new platform becomes another walled garden that recreates the very problem they intend to solve.
This is where new incentive structures finally could break the extraction cycle. Datadaos creates an immediate opportunity for users to port their data through financial incentives, solve the cold starting problem as long as the data is boarding a self -indulgent, interoperable way, as in the VANA. As more users bring their data into these interoperable systems, developers can build applications that were not possible before.
Imagine a personal health coach that can analyze your sleep data from Oura, your training from Strava, your nutrition from food supplies and your stress levels from communication patterns.
Or an AI assistant that really understands you because it can access your complete digital history while maintaining your privacy through granular permits.
This solves a critical problem that has plagued previous attempts at data portability. Users do not export their data without clear benefits, and developers do not build for portable data without users. Data Daos breaks this stalemate by making it immediately worth it for users to connect data.
More important is that when users make their data self -refurbished, completely new kinds of applications become possible. AI agents can access your complete digital history to give truly personalized experiences. Developers can build applications that combine data in ways that were not possible when silenced over platforms.
We know that there is a lot of demand for AI training data-many larger model providers are ready to hit a data egg soon, causing them to search for publicly unavailable data sets to train newer, higher performing models. New models such as Deepseek have shown the value of high quality data with carefully curated human generated examples to bootstrap their new training method. At the same time, user data policies such as GDPR and CCPA require legal platforms to allow users to export their data in a useful, standardized format. Networks like VANA allow users to make money on their data by collectively negotiating with model coaches who need valuable training data that is no longer available on the public internet and makes them interoperable for real data sovereignty.
Two forces that converge – the spread of AI and new financial incentives – create the potential for both users and developers to take advantage of data portability. Users, developers and data networks are finally interested. Users get immediate value plus better AI experiences, developers have access to rich user data to build new applications, and networks are getting stronger with each new participant.
For the first time, we have both the technology to make data portability valuable and the incentives to drive.
Crypto has not yet delivered its original promise of a self -conformity, interoperable internet, where users own their data, unbound by Web2’s Walled Gardens. By creating financial incentives to bring data on board and utilize AI’s capabilities, we finally have a window of opportunities to make the Internet really user owned.