- Chatgpt will now use Washington Post To provide answers using newspaper’s reporting
- Chatgpt -Splies will now include summary, quotes and article links
- The move is based on Openai’s growing list of news partners and the post’s own AI initiatives
Washington Post has ink an appointment with Openai to make his journalism available directly inside Chatgpt. This means that the next time you ask Chatgpt about something in the direction of “What will happen to the Supreme Court this week?” Or “How’s the housing market today?” You may get an answer including one Post Article overview, a relevant offer and a clickable link to the full article.
For companies, the mating gives plenty of sense. Award-winning journalism plus an AI tool used by more than 500 million people a week has obvious appeal. An information pipeline that lives somewhere between a search engine, a news app and a research assistant lures fans of one or both products. And the two companies insist that their goal is to do actual, high quality reporting that is more accessible at the age of conversation AI.
This partnership will move chatgpt’s response to news -related queries so that relevant coverage from The post will be a probable addition, complete with attribution and context. So when something bigger happens in Congress, or a new international conflict breaks out, users will be directed to the post’s trusted reporting. In an ideal world, it would cut down on speculation, paraphrased half-spirit and straight up-up information that sneaks into AI-generated answers.
This is not Openai’s first media rodeo. The company has already collaborated with over 20 news publishers, including Associated Press, Le Monde, The Guardian, and Axel jumps. These partnerships all have a similar form: Openai licenses content, so its models can generate answers that include accurate summary and link back to source journalism while sharing some revenue with publishers.
For Openai, collaborating with news organizations is more than just PR -Polish. It is a practical step towards ensuring that AI’s future does not just repeat what Reddit and Wikipedia had to say in 2021. Instead, it integrates ongoing ongoing, updated journalism into how it responds to questions in the real world.
WAPO AI
Washington Post has its own ambitions around AI. The company has already tested ideas such as its “Ask the Post Ai” Chatbot to answer questions using the newspaper’s content. There are also the climate answers chatbot that the publication released specifically to answer questions and share information based on the newspaper’s climate journalism. Internally, the news room has built tools such as Haystacker that help journalists to sille through massive data sets and find storytelling buried in the numbers.
Starry-eyed idealism is nice, but there are some open questions. For example, will the journalists who worked hard to report and write these stories be compensated for having their work embedded in Chatgpt? Of course, there is a link to their story, but it does not count as a point of view or helps to lead a reader to other pieces of the author or their colleagues.
From a broader perspective will not make chatgpt a layer between the reader and the newspaper simply continue the undermining subscription and revenue needed to keep a media company fluid? Whether this is a mutually supportive arrangement or just AI that absorbs the best of the hard work of many people while discarding the actual people to see. Makes chatgpt more reliable with Washington Post Is a good idea, but we will need to control future headlines to see if AI is beneficial to the newspaper.
