Islamabad:

Five Islamabad High Court (IHC) judges have told the Supreme Court that the whole process of the transfer of three judges from various high courts to IHC was carried out in unnecessary haste and occupied with Mala Fides and motivated by the Federation’s desire to punish IHC judges and implement a “takeover” of a Supreme Court.

Another Judge Judge Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Justice Ijaz Ishaq, Justice Saman Riffat Imtiaz and Justice Babar Sattar Through their advice – Muneer a Malik and lawyer Salahuddin Ahmed – presented their glow in the APEX court, which hears their audience who Various High -Courts -submitted to the fact that they are pleased in the APEX court IHC.

The Rejoorter says that after the petitioners wrote a letter dated 25.3.2024 to the Supreme Court Council (SJC) complaining about cases of performing interference in their legal functions and attempting to scare them and conduct secret surveillance against them, caused several attacks on them (some of them could only come from government sources).

“Apart from a media -roles against those who accused them of being a political partisan (which was also the narrative promoted on the media by several senior members), a large number of complaints were filed with the highest legal advice against them for all forms of imaginary offenses and alleged mismatches from alleged double nationality, false degrees, abuse of authority to authority to the authority.

It is also claimed that the family data from one of the petitions (including passport information that could have only been leaked by a state authority) were released on social media. For one of the other petitions, his legal degree, dating more than three decades, was suddenly canceled by a government university, and a FIA study was initiated, says Rightoinder.

It also states that on one occasion, no less than four different state agencies (namely PTA, Pemra, FIA and IB), identical applications for the conversion of one of the petitioners moved that he was partial against intelligence agencies.

“Obviously, the six judges’ letters gave rise to great Animus against the petitions of part of many senior government officials” “

It is stated that the entire process from the flow of summary to the commencement of the transfer process to approvals from the Prime Minister and the President to seek the consent of the judges proposed to be transferred, as well as the four affected judge, fled the final summary of the transfer of transfer, obtained approval from Prime Minister and President, and the issuance of transfer of transfer of transfer of transfer were completed within 4 Learned Judge and 2 days to the third after the third judge. This unprecedented haste speaks binders about the association’s motivation, ”it adds.

It is also stated that the Federation, even in his first summary, who tried to initiate the transfer process, had already decided that at least such a judge would be selected for transfer which, if given seniority from the date of his oath in his parent company, would surpass all the petitions in seniority. This choice is also remarkable considering that the only reason for the transfers is the under -representation of certain provinces, but for the other two provinces relatively junior judges were chosen. “

“However, the petitioners do not want to raise any personal complaint about the way they have been dealt with, nor do they raise a question that simply relates to their personal seniority. What is more important is that the unprecedented way in which the function of a Supreme Court can be affected by the Federation by using its powers to transfer in a Mala Fide way.”