Islamabad:

Five legal officers who were members of senior Puisne -Judge of Supreme Court Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah in the Federal Judicial Academy (FJA) have been repatriated to their parent department, which is Lahore High Court.

“In the exercise of powers awarded by sub -section (3) of section 11 of the Federal Judicial Academy Act, 1997 (XXVIII from 1997), the honorary man of Pakistan/Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Judicial Academy, is happy to repatin the legal official who is currently published at Federal Academy, Depreciation, to their parenting department, “the listing exposed by General General General General General, General Filma, Islamabad on the deposition of the author, to their parent department of their parenti,” Note the remark Hayat Ali Shah on the instruction of CJP Yahya Afridi.

These judicial officers are District and Sessions Judge Jazeela Aslam, additional district and sessions Judge Muhammad Amir Munir, additional District and Sessions Judge Dr. Rai Muhammad Khan, additional district and sessions Judge Raja Jahanzaib Akhtar and Civil Judge/Judge Magistrate Shazia Munawar Makhdoom.

The officers report to Lahore High Court to use the usual joining time as presumably according to the rules. Their return is considered a result of the ongoing clash between CJP Afridi and Justice Shah, which is also replaced with Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb as responsible for FJA.

The relationship between two top SC judges is not cordial in the last few months. Even there are reports that Justice Shah did not attend Iftar dinner given by CJP Afridi at CJP House last week. A source claims that justice shah and justice at have minallah was not invited to dinner.

Previously, justice could Syed Mansoor Ali Shah fly to Saudi Arabia to attend two events in arbitration for lack of ex-Pakistan-leave.

Justice Shah was invited to provide key notes at two events in the arbitration week in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia organized by Al Baraka Forum and Organization of Islamic Cooperation Arbitration Center (OIC-AC).

During the week, Justice Shah also wanted to perform Umrah before the start of the holy month Ramazan.

The senior Puisne judge had made a request to CJP Yahya Afridi about Ex-Pakistan-Orlov well in time, who remained unanswered and convincing Justice Mansoor to cancel his trip to Saudi Arabia as his magazines could not be sanctioned.

Likewise, four Justices, who opposed the Supreme Court’s judges of the Point Court, have been removed from the main administrative committees according to CJP Yahya Afridis restructuring plan.

CJP Afridi reconstituted several committees and replaced senior rights with junior. Those who were excluded from critical roles included justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Ayesha Malik, Justice ATHER MINALLAH and Justice Aqeel Ahmad Abbasi.

Attorneys consider that this is a clash between recipients and troubled judges for 26. Constitutional amendment.

Had CJP Afridi put together a full court to hear petitions against the 26th constitutional amendment, the situation could have been different, the legal experts said.

Two judges, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Munib Akhtar, who formed the majority of the relevant committee, had ordered the constitution of a full court to hear the petitions in the first week of November.

Instead of constructing the case, however, CJP Afridi convened a meeting of the Legal Commission in Pakistan (JCP) to choose judges for the constitutional bench. The constitutional bench has not yet decided petitions against 26. Constitutional amendment.

Then a three-judge bench led by Justice Shah had raised questions whether the ordinary bench could be blocked to judge the questions related to the interpretation of law and constitution by the 26th constitutional amendment.

However, the case was withdrawn from the ordinary bench of the committees.

A division bench of the point of point led by justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah found that the members of both committees violated the legal order and withdrew the case from ordinary bench. The bench noted that committee members have committed contempt; Therefore, the full court should be composed to initiate the procedure.

However, the members of the constitutional bench were visibly upset and they set aside the legal order of the ordinary bench. Recently, the federal government also filed the Intra Court appeals to regular bench orders in contempt.

Attorneys believe that clashes between SC -judges were intensified after the issue of contempt notice to additional registrar Nazar Abbas.

They also say that if the clash between Senior SC judges continues, the overall court will be further weakened and the situation will be favorable to the recipients of the 26th constitutional amendment.