Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have experienced being hit by the way they have lived their lives since Megxit, and it comes in the form of a cover story from Vanity Fair to their February edition.

Royal commentator Daniela Elser referred it all in her piece for News.com. Au.

Everything started with the expert saying, “The Roman Empire? It lasted 449 years.”

But “The House of Sussex? Less than five years after Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in Los Angeles landed too boldly to go where no HRH had gone before, and things fall around their ears.”

And ‘the sinner’, as Mrs. Elser calls it is Vanity Fair’s February history of Sussexes and their previous confluence with Hollywood producers, employees, a streaming giant and the like.

One aspect that triggered a global outbreak was charges against Meghan of being an “evil girl” who would trigger an employee’s need for “long -term therapy” after ending hiring, to Prince Harry, who was “painted as a bit of a pathetic man -child”.

However, this was not labeled as the most devastating line, for the expert believes that the fact that the author admits to having spent ‘months’ interviewing “dozens of people who have worked with and lived with the couple” is that, it is, There does as it makes it more than one tabloid hit.

In Mrs. Elser’s eyes, “Neither can this report be written off as the British press’s supposed party work with their perma ax to grind against Crown Inc’s self-proclaimed refugees.”

What it is is that the “Vanity Fair name brings a degree of journalistic credibility with it.”

Before “the piece went into pressure, it would probably have been thoroughly fact -checked by experienced sub -editors, and the publication’s legal team would have gone through this with a fine duck and a big red pen,” she admitted before concluding.