Google’s new search live feature allows users to hold vocal conversations in real time with an AI-driven version of search The gemini-driven AI tries to simulate a friendly and knowledgeable person. Google is eager to get all ways to lead to Gemini, and searching live can help entice people to try the AI -Ledes Case without realizing
Google’s quest to incorporate its Gemini in total have a new outlets that are linked to its most central product. The new Google Search Live essentially gives Google Search’s AI mode a gemini-driven voice.
It is currently available to users in the US via the Google app on iOS and Android, and it invites you to literally talk to your search box. You are talking, and it speaks back; Unlike the half-hearted AI assistants yesterday, this one does not stop listening to just one question. It is a full dialogue partner, as opposed to the non-verbal AI mode.
It also works in the background, which means I could leave the app under the chat to do something else on my phone and the sound didn’t pause or glitch. It just continued as if I were on the phone with someone.
Google refers to this system as a “query fan-out”, which means that instead of just answering your question, it also consider related queries and draws several different sources and perspectives. You feel it too. The answers do not feel the box in a single form of response, even on relatively straightforward queries such as the one about linen dresses in Google’s demo.
Search Live: Talk, Listen and Explore in real time with AI mode – YouTube
Look at
AI -Search Live
To test search live out, I knocked on the “Live” icon and asked for speculative fiction books I should read this summer. The brilliant voice offered a few classic and a few recent options. Then I opened Pandora’s box by asking it about his own favorites. Surprisingly, it had a few. Then I decided to push it a little and tell it it was wrong about the best fantasy books and listed a few of my own. Suddenly, I was in a debate not only about the best examples of the genre, but also how to define it.
We looked from there to philosophical and historical opinions about AlishPathi, and whether AI should be compared to genes or the mythical brownies that perform housework in exchange for cream. Were it not for the smooth, synthetic voice and its merciless good cheerfulness, I might have thought that I actually had a vacant argument with an acquaintance over nothing important.
It is obviously very different from the classic Google search and its wall of links. If you look at the screen, you still see the links but the focus is on the lecture. Google is not unique with a vocal version of its AI, as chatgpt and others provide similar features. Google Search Live comes out as smoother and I didn’t have to reformulate my questions or repeat myself once in 10 minutes. Being integrated with Google’s actual search systems can help keep things ground. It’s like talking to someone who always has a stack of quotes in their back pocket.
I don’t think search live is what people will use to replace their usual online search methods, but here’s a real availability in favor of it. For people who can’t comfortably write or see, voice-first tools like this open new doors. The same goes for children who ask questions about homework, or to someone who makes dinner who has a random question but does not want to pause to wipe flour off their screen.
Of course, there is a trade -off of how people are reviewing the Internet. If this kind of conversation AI becomes the dominant interface to search on Google, what happens to web traffic? Publishers already feel that they are shouting into the void when their contents foamed by AI and hiring lawyers to fight it. What will the AI search if its sources shrink or disappear? It is a complicated question worthy of debate. I will have to see how search live determines the arguments.
You also like
