Islamabad has heavily censored New Delhi over the “ruthless” and “hatred” remarks from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi against Pakistan and describes them as the product of “the theatrical flowering of a campaign rally rather than the soberness expected by the leader of a nuclear preserved state”.
“The hate -driven invitation of violence in his remarks is deeply disturbing, not only for its content, but for the dangerous precedent it puts in a region already burdened by volatility,” the Foreign Office in Islamabad said in a statement issued on social media on Tuesday.
“We regret the continued erosion of maturity and decor in Indian state power.”
The Indian Prime Minister had said that those who found terror had not even imagined in their dreams how difficult it is to meet modi.
“Ever since Pakistan was born, it has focused on animosity with India, while in India we have focused on removing poverty, growth and development,” he said, approaching a public rally in Dahod on Monday, the first day of his two-day visit to Gujarat.
Islamabad has strongly condemned the Indian Prime Minister’s comments during the Gujarat visit and describes them as “ruthless” and provocative.
The Foreign Office emphasized that the Indian leaders’ remarks were deeply disturbing and added: “This kind of inflammatory rhetoric contradicts the core principles of the charter of the United Nations.”
It added that all Member States are obliged to resolve disputes peacefully and must refrain from the threat or use of force against the sovereignty and political independence of other nations.
Islamabad considers Mr. Modi’s comments as “reckless provocation” aimed at diverting attention from what it described as “ongoing violations of human rights and demographic technique” in Indian illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK).
At least 26 people were killed in the April 22 attack on tourists in the scenic Pahaldam area in IIOJK. After the incident, India accused Pakistan without presenting evidence, a claim denied by Islamabad. In response, India launched a number of small cross -border attacks followed by missile attacks inside Pakistan.
By tackling students from various universities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on May 25, Director-General of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said Lieutenant Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry that all strategies devised by India and Prime Minister Narendra Modi had been systematically proven by Pakistan’s decisive actions.
He detailed Pakistan’s retaliatory measures after the 6-7. May events, which revealed that Chief of Army Staff (Coas), Fieldmarshal Syed Asim Munir, ordered strikes in 26 Indian locations.
Pakistan’s armed forces then launched a large-scale military action, named Operation Bunyan-Um-Marsoos, which targeted several Indian military sites in several regions on May 10th.
The conflict, which was provoked by India, lasted for at least 87 hours and ended the same day with a ceasefire agreement that was broken by the United States.
In today’s statement, Islamabad confirmed its credentials as a leading contributor to the UN peacekeeping and its long -standing cooperation in Global Terrorism Control efforts and said they speak louder than “any hostile audio bit”.
The Foreign Office also criticized the growing influence of the Hindutva ideology in India, claiming an increase in majoritarism and religious intolerance.
“If extremism is really a concern for the Indian government, it would make it good to turn inward – taking the alarming rise in majoritarism, religious intolerance and the systematic liberation of minorities under the increasingly brutal Hindutva ideology,” the statement reads.
Islamabad repeated his commitment to peace based on mutual respect and sovereign equality, while making it clear that any threat to Pakistan’s security or territorial integrity would be met with a firm and proportionate response.
“We will act in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter that recognizes the right to self-defense,” it said.
Islamabad also called on the international community to take note of what it described as “India’s escalating rhetoric” and warned that it is undermining regional peace and bringing the possibility of meaningful dialogue.
