The case against Sean Diddy Combs has led to a lot of interest to grow up in the eyes of legal experts.
One of them, former federal prosecutor in Detroit, Mark Chutkow, shared their thoughts on the prosecutor’s courtroom strategy against Diddy.
He shared it all while he was talking to Rolling stones And noticed that both the graphic evidence as well as Casandra Ventura’s claims to be forced into illegal meetings with an escort were all things that came in quick order at the start of the hearing.
“It’s a shock and awe,” he said, referring to Diddy’s ex allegations.
“Here, [Combs] is beautiful, charismatic and known for many years in the New York area. They will immediately turn that tale so that any potential teamout jury manager looks more skeptical at him. “
All in all, “they really want to create an impression of him right out of the gate.”
However, in terms of the video part of the evidence where Diddy was seen assaulted by his ex Casandra ‘Cassie’ at a hotel, the expert in human traffic cases said: “It knows video is that you can’t really cross-examin video.”
“In the Derek Chauvin case, they showed the video of him that put his knee against George Floyd’s neck at the beginning, middle and end of the case. It’s something that the defense couldn’t really address.”
For those who are not daring with the George Floyd case, he was a 46-year-old black man who died in a hand of a former Minneapolis police officer named Chauvin.
Former federal prosecutor Braid Bailey has made a similar claim of the guard involved in the “woman in distress” because the witness, guard Israel Florez, admitted to having offered a whole wad of cash to stay quiet after seeing ‘visible’ signs of damage to Cassie.
He said, “I think this was strategically thought out.” Because “he is a non-involved witness in terms that are just hotel security staff. He does not necessarily want any share in any of this. It is extremely useful for the prosecution.”
The cash offer was also something that Mr Bailey referred to later in his chat. Because he thinks “when you can lead with a concrete example of power, it is an extremely powerful way to start. It immediately throws Mr. Combs in an extremely negative light, which will be difficult for the jury to stop seeing him in. It is not necessarily invincible, but it is not a picture you want in the juror’s mind.”
