Lahore:

Lahore High Court (LHC) has rejected the appeal of a man who, while transferring a piece of property to his nephews, declared himself their father in the Tamleek deed and later gave his own sons the same names as his nephews in an attempt to acquire the property through deception.

There were two real bothering – Servant Muhammad Nawaz and Muhammad Aslam. Nawaz gave 400-channel property in 1975 to two minors, namely-Muhammad Farukh and Muhammad Mohsin alias Nijal, who were the sons of Muhammad Aslam.

However, he fraudulently showed himself as their father in the registered deeds. Then he tried to manipulate the situation to favor his own sons by giving them similar names.

This scheme continued undisputed for years during the life of Muhammad Aslam. Years later, the finished – Farukh and Mohsin, Aslam’s sons – instituted a civilian case against Nawaz and his sons as well as Punjab’s government.

The court’s court made a decision in favor of the right sons of Muhammad Aslam. The petitioners contested this order, but the appeal court also maintained the court’s decision.

The petitions, including Muhammad Nawaz, later moved the LHC Multan bench, where justice Anwaar Hussain rejected his plea, also maintained the court’s decisions.

Farukh and Mohsin – Sons of Aslam – claimed that the total property measuring the 818 channel – 17 Marlas – was purchased by their uncle (Nawaz) and their late father (Muhammad Aslam) jointly. However, it was bought in Nawaz’s name when their father was a government employee.

Nawaz later transferred the Suit Measurement of 400 Channel, out of the total purchased land, to their advantage as a recognition that the property of the suit was purchased with the funds for the deceased Muhammad Aslam.

However, Nawaz fraudulently showed himself as their father in the registered deeds and subsequently manipulated the situation to favor his own sons by giving them the same names for the purpose of losing ownership. It was stated that registered deeds that are attested in the persecution of the Tamleek deeds, to the extent that there is custody of Farukh and Moshin, are against the law as well as Shariah and is based on Mala Fide.

The petitions – Nawaz and his sons – took the defense that the property property was purchased with funds surrendered by Nawaz from the United Kingdom.

They claimed that the transfer of suit property through Tamleek items was always intended for his own sons. After framing questions and the inclusion of evidence, the trial passed through judgment on March 28, 2013 Responsents’ Suit – the Sons of Aslam.