Prince Harry has been reprimanded for having done things in his past that risked the complete abolition of his royal family, all while calling another of ‘weak moral character’.

The royal commentator and writer Amanda Platell brought these accusations in his piece to Daily Mail.

It started with the fact that she herself accused the Duke, of having a slight moral character, which he accused people of having in his Invictus games inauguration’s speech.

While carrying it, she explained that the main reason for this and said, “After all, the deceased Queen’s grandson abandoned the royal family in a pit of Pique, causing his guards grandmother Elizabeth II in her last year to become plagued by pain and controversy. “

“He and Megs even accused some of Granny’s family of being racist,” so “how contemptuously low can you get?” Mrs Platell even went so far as to question.

But what was worse, though, is the fact that “it didn’t end there.”

Because in Mrs. Platell’s eyes, “led by Meghan, he not only betrayed his grandparents, but William and Kate, as well as his father and Camilla, with his hateful memoir reserve and the tender Oprah interview.”

At that time, “the consequences of Harry’s attack on his relatives and the crown was so devastating that there was a time when many thought it could report the end of the monarchy.”

This led to her ending her piece with the question, “What kind of character spoils with such an eerie, self -pitying, abhorrent behavior – except one with weak morality?”