• Imran Khan’s plea submitted in accordance with Article 184 (2). 3, in the Constitution.
• The PTI founder calls on the court to investigate the compilation of false, false results.
• The registrar’s office instructed to assign numbers, fix pleas for hearing.
  

Islamabad: The Supreme Court has admitted to Pakistan Tehreek-E-Insaf’s (PTI) pleas seeking the formation of a commission of inquiry to investigate the alleged rigging in the 8th of February 2025 elections, The news Reported Saturday.

A five-member bench of the point of point led by Justice Amin-out-Din Khan heard the petitions filed by the PTI founder and former Prime Minister Khan as well as party leader Sher Afzal Marwat against rigging in the 2024 parliamentary elections.

Ex-PM, on March 20, 2024, had filed a petition in accordance with Article 184 (2).

In a plea that was filed via Ptis Omar Ayub Khan, the PTI founder asked the right to the point that a judicial commission consisting of serving SC -judges who had no bias to anyone should be formed to inquire, revise and investigate the manner and process of the 2024 parliamentary elections and the development took place to put together false and fraud. Losers to gain.

He requested that all the consequences of forming governments on federal and Punjab levels be suspended immediately until the result of the probe of the legal commission appointed on this behalf is published.

Similarly, PTI leader Marwat, elected to MNA from the National Assembly’s Constitution Na-41 on February 23, 2024, had also submitted a petition in SC in accordance with Article 184 (2). 3, of the Constitution against alleged Riging in the Voting 8th February.

Filed through his lawyer Riaz Hanif Rahi, Marwat had prayed to the Point Court that the process of forming governments is held in accordance until the final decision in his petition.

However, the registrar’s office had raised objections to the petitions. On Friday, the Hamid Court, adviser to the PTI founder asked that the Justice Secretary’s office had raised objections to the petition.

However, Hamid, who appeared before the Court through VideoLink, the Lahore registration database, told the court that the most important objection from the Secretary of Justice was that the Court cannot constitute the Commission of Investigation to investigate the alleged rigging at the 2024 election.

The learned lawyer remembered before the court that SC had earlier in 2012 constituted a commission of inquiry in the Memogate Scandal case, while the Court in 2016 had also nominated a commission of inquiry led by Justice Qazi Faez Isa to investigate the Quetta Bomb Blast case.

However, the court noted that, after the adoption of legislation made in 2017, the government’s power is to constitute a commission or not.

However, Hamid argued that in 2012, SC recommended the formation of a commission of inquiry in the Memogate case by maintaining that at any time there is a question of national importance and security, such a commission may consist of.

The lawyer also requested the court to remove the objections, raised by the registrar’s office on their petition and had to be heard about profits.

Similarly, Riaz Hanif Rahi, attorney for Marwat, the court said that an appeal was filed against objection returned by the Justice Secretary’s office with the observation that the case is now laid down before the court, which is no longer a chamber.

He claimed that as the case has been filed for judicial decision and cannot be treated on the administrative side, it is therefore numbered and his petition is determined and heard about profits.

Later, the court admitted to having heard both petitions after removing the objections raised by the Justice Secretary’s office on the petitions and ordered his office to assign the numbers to both the petitions and be determined for hearing.

The Court then postponed the case for date on Office (indefinite period).