Islamabad:

The Supreme Court has decided that any passivity on part of a Supreme Court of Supreme Court in response to a complaint from a legal officer regarding the interference of executive agencies would be contrary to his constitutional obligations under Article 203 of the Constitution.

“Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court: First, acted within its constitutional authority under Article 203 to oversee the procedure for subordinate courts, including anti-terrorism courts; and secondly, in light evidence.

We are aware that a Supreme Court Supreme Court in a province of a province of a province are the patering families in the judiciary of this province. Therefore, any passivity on his part in response to any such as complaint from a legal officer would be in violation of his constitutional obligations under Article 203 of the Constitution, “A four-page judgment authorized by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi Read, while hearing an exertion of an effort assigned to an effort by Chief Justice of Pakistan. (CJP) Department against the then Chief Justice Lahore High Court (LHC) on applications moved by the state seeking transfer of cases from an presidential judge of anti-terrorism court (ATC) to another.

The most important driving force for the special prosecutor representing the state was that conclusions registered in Parasat 8 and 9 of the orders were not only unsolicited, but also beyond the mandate of the authority, awarded to Chief Justice.

It should be noted that the former LHC CJ Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan had taken a position against the performing agencies -interference in ATC judges.

He even took a strong exception to the Punjab government’s request to transfer the ATC Rawalpindi judge. The Punjab government was reluctant to appoint the ATCS judges recommended by the ex-LHC Chief Justice.

He had referred a complaint about the ex-ATC judge Sargodha to the Point Court, who heard Suo Motu cases about six Islamabad High Court judge’s letter against agencies’ interference in their legal functions.

Meanwhile, with the help of ex-CJP Qazi Faez Isa, the government was able to raise Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan to the pointed right. Four Supreme Court’s judges were not for his height to the point of point as they felt that the Punjab Court needed a strong administrative head.