Top Court Questions Super Tax on PFS

Islamabad:

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard petitions who challenged the introduction of a super tax on confidential means, with a five-member constitutional bench led by justice Aminuddin Khan questioning whether such a tax is justified when the income tax itself is exempt.

During the hearing, justice quoted Muhammad Ali Mazhar section 53 of the Income Tax Regulation, which gives exceptions and asked if a Trust Fund could be treated as private property.

Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi warned that repeated super -tax deductions could erode pension benefits over time, observing that an initial tax could grow significantly and reduce employees’ expected payments.

Justice Rizvi also questioned how a clerk of advance tax could be calculated, a concern that was repeated by Justice Mazhar, who noted that advance payments would be difficult without final deserves.

Further lawsuit claimed that the second schedule gives exceptions to exemptions, including from super tax, but maintained that the government can impose extra taxes if tax needs arise.

Advises Asma Hamid opposed that Provident Funds enjoys statutory relief and that a super -tax contradicts regulatory intention.

The bench noted that the responsibility for super tax pay is mentioned in the relevant schedule, but questioned whether the government can impose a tax when the income tax itself cannot be used.

Later, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) lawyer Hafiz Ehsan began short posts and said he would help the court on legal and constitutional points and adopt arguments already presented by Hamid.

Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar urged advice to conduct arguments on key questions during the next hearing. Hafiz Ehsan only requested for ten minutes, but Justice Aminuddin Khan noted that the session could not continue due to a judge’s other obligations, which was given the postponement.

The consultation was postponed until Tuesday.

The petitions challenge the legality of the super -tax imposed on certain sectors, arguing that it exceeds the government’s constitutional authority.

Super tax

The super tax is an additional tax on high -performance individuals, businesses and industries that are largely aimed at large companies. In the federal budget 2022-23, the government introduced up to 10% super tax on larger sectors, including cement, steel, sugar, oil and gas, fertilizers, banks and textiles, citing the need to raise extra revenue for financial stabilization.

Petitions that challenge the tax are filed before the supreme court of individuals and organizations. At the previous hearing, the bench was assessed by FBR that no one had contested Lahore High Court’s (LHC) judgment, maintaining the legality of the super tax imposed under section 4C of the income tax word, 2001, while reducing its rate from 10% to 4% for 16 sectors, including banking and offering partial relief.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top