Tory Lanez finally gave an answer after the effort to overturn shooting oversight

Tory Lanez finally handed over a clear answer about his 10-year conviction

Tory Lanez, the legal name Dayystar Peterson, was accused of shooting Megan you stallion in both feet has been soning a 10-year verdict since July 2020, but even during this period he has not stopped trying to overthrow his conviction using multiple ways. Now an update has come after his efforts.

According to Rolling stonesThe news came just Tuesday when an appeal in California denied the applicant’s writing of Habea’s corpus petition filed in 2023 and 2024.

The petition was intended to deny the jury’s decision on his judgment and request invalid it based on claims that it was not presented during the trial.

For those who are not reversed, the applicant’s writing of Habea’s Corpus is a legal procedure available to all prisoners, thereby fighting the charges against them. It further forces the government to bring the prisoner out to the public and again justifies their decision to imprison them.

The reason for the rejection is because California Second District Court believes that Lanez’s appeal does not meet the necessary requirements for HABEA.

What is relevant to mention is that his main focal point has been that the firearm used in the shooting of Megan, Stallion, had “been wrongly placed and is currently missing,” but the three-judge panel denies the claim.

A sworn LAPD officer’s swore testimony was quoted to confirm the existence of the firearm, its magazine as well as all bullets, fragments, etc. remains in police custody.

It is because of this that Lanez “could not request additional DNA tests in the trial.” In the eyes of the justice system, he also failed to explain how any additional test could free him. Plus, if he talked about “the ball fragments that surgeons removed from the victim’s feet,” so “it is unlikely that they have usable fingerprints or DNA.”

During the trial, the same case was made and was given the right to believe that Lanez could neither be considered or excluded as a minor contributor to the DNA found on firearms because the magazine attempt was inconsistent.

Currently, the rapper’s legal team is ready to go to trial Monday and claim that the previous path was not fair. Another aspect is that Lanez claims that his lawyer offered “ineffective advice” to him by not “opposing” for a few moments of Megan’s testimony to him.

He also claimed that there was ‘mismatch’ among prosecutors during Megan’s testimony.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top