Lahore:
The 26 PTI legislators in the Punjab Assembly, which were suspended in view of their disruptive behavior, have not yet used the possibility of a consultation provided by the legislature’s speeches, Malik Muhammad Ahmed Khan.
On June 27, Khan speaks these MPAs suspended to create “disturbance, ruckus and sing unseemly slogans” under Punjab -Ever Minister Maryam Nawaz in House 3 in accordance with Rule 210 (2).
The speaker had allowed the legislators to appear in his chamber and give an explanation before July 11 (today). When talking to Express Pakinomist, head of Opposition Malik Ahamd Khan Bhachar, who belongs to PTI, confirmed that they consulted their legal team about the speaker’s opportunity.
“We will make a decision with regard to the speaker’s consultation in a parliamentary meeting held on July 11 (today),” he added.
A reliable source seeking anonymity told The Express Pakinomist that a majority of PTI’s MPAs are willing to use this option, place their case for the speaker and ask him if they could be suspended in response to their protest during CM’s speech.
Spoken Khan has also received references to the incompatibility of the MPAs in accordance with Article 63 (2). 2, read with Article 113 of the Constitution and it is mandatory for him to decide these references within 30 days.
The speaker on June 28 also sought the recovery of damage to RS2.035,000 from 10 PTI’s MPAs – RS203.550 each – over mounting on their desks and broken 8 microphones during their protest on June 16, when the provincial government presented the budget.
Speaking Khan had also ordered that opposition MPA Hassan Malik (PP-81) would remain absent from the assembly until the prorogation of the current session. He had issued this order after Hassan Malik threw a budgetary book on Finance Minister Mian Mujtaba Shujaur Rehman.
On June 24, Khan also gave up that “All members, regardless of their political affiliation, to preserve the Decorum, [will] Maintain the value of this August Assembly and make sure that parliamentary procedure can continue without disturbance ”.
He had warned that in the future he would “take all steps within the legal framework to maintain order and maintain dignity in August and its members”. He had submitted this decision in response to Bhacha’s order that protest is a constitutional right.
To determine whether the right to protest and freedom of expression is an absolute right to the members, the speaker mentioned Rule 223 of the procedure.
The opposition leader strongly condemned these orders. He made it clear that the opposition will continue his protest.
