After King Charles’ encounter with Prince Harry, revelations came over the Duke’s intentions.
While claims claim that the Duke wants to ‘help’ his older brother, a source claimed “put to bed many years ago” because he is “very happy with his life in California.” As well as “just visiting Britain when and when to support his patronage and causes.”
Later, the feelings were also repeated by a spokesman who said, “The Duke has made it clear that; the focus must be on his father ‘, beyond that, and on all other questions that it concerns his family, we will not comment.”
For those who have not been blamed with the comments that brought back all this forward when Megxit conversations were underway, conversations were exchanged about a ‘half and half’ event where Sussexes could make their own money and also participate in a few royal commitments a year.
However, this proposal had been rejected at the time, and it seems that King Charles is also stuck on his late mother’s decisions. Lead a source to come forward and tell Daily Mail“Whoever lies behind them seems to have confused a short tea and a slice of cake to the Versailles Treaty.”
Because “These syrupy orientations from supposed Sussex sources are precisely the reason why the king and the royal family are so hesitant to start every way to approximately.”
The reason is “If the intention is to encourage a reconstruction of trust and relationship, they serve the exact opposite effect.”
Also “as last week’s state visit clearly demonstrated, the power and effect of modern monarchy lies in the unwavering bond between the king and the prince of Wales, supported by other working members of the family.”
The claim that initiated all this was a report from The telegraph It claimed, “The king has been ready to maintain his late mother’s decision that there can be no ‘half-in, half-out’ public role for family members.”
