- Euro-Office uses Microsoft’s OOXML format by default, which encourages vendor lock-in
- LibreOffice calls the European sovereign that offers an obvious “freeware” copy of MS Office
- Euro-Office and its origin, OnlyOffice, are mostly created by Russian developers
The Document Foundation – the organization behind LibreOffice – has publicly criticized Euro-Office over concerns that it does not really promote European digital sovereignty, despite its marketing as a viable European alternative to Microsoft Office.
LibreOffice described Euro-Office as a “freeware clone” of its Big Tech rival and claimed its strategy is to mimic Microsoft’s interface and workflows.
Conversely, OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice are “two true open source office suites, built from source code originating in Europe,” founder Italo Vignoli wrote in an open letter.
Euro-Office thought about several sovereignty concerns
In the letter, Vignoli described Microsoft’s “terrible proprietary OOXML format,” acknowledging the format’s use to prevent sovereignty efforts by supporting vendor lock-in. An understandable strategy from a technology vendor that, historically at least, has not actively supported sovereignty efforts over clear desires to grow the company.
But while this much is understandable, Vignoli questions why “Euro-Office defaults to the fully proprietary OOXML document format,” arguing that it simply reinforces Microsoft’s ecosystem and creates a long-term dependency on the company’s products.
The original announcement described Euro-Office as a “superb replacement for Microsoft Office” with an “intuitive interface” and “strong compatibility.” The familiar interface is believed to be intended to make migration easier.
European tech companies such as IONOS, Nextcloud, Eurostack, XWiki, OpenProject, Soverin, Abilian and BTactic are behind the initiative.
Security issues
Another sovereignty concern is the Euro-Office’s potential – if somewhat severed – ties to Russia. Euro-Office is actually based on an existing project called OnlyOffice, which only recently separated from this project in March 2026.
Cyber news has revealed that up to 99% of the code base can be traced back to developers working in Russian time zones, with only a small portion of the contributions coming from the European consortium itself.
In addition, the new sovereign project appears to continue to merge select code changes from the upstream project, indicating that it is still dependent on Russian software developers.
With this in mind, users may have concerns about vulnerabilities, malicious code insertion, and wider dependency risks that totally negate the sovereign effort in the first place.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews and opinions in your feeds.



