- VPN providers are not liable for copyright infringement, the European Court of Justice said
- The Court expressly recognized VPNs as “lawful technical tools”
- The case centered on the fight over copyright Anne Frank’s diary
In a major victory for digital rights and common sense, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has officially categorized virtual private networks (VPNs) as “lawful technical tools” while establishing new boundaries for online copyright disputes.
The landmark judgment – handed down in July 2026 – stems from a complex legal battle over the online publication of Anne Frank’s historic manuscripts. At its heart, the case forced Europe’s top judges to answer a very technical question: If a publisher actively tries to block visitors from a particular country, are they still breaking the law if a user sneaks past the digital border using circumvention software?
According to the European Court of Justice, the answer is no. As long as a website uses “state-of-the-art” geo-blocking technology, the publisher cannot be held liable for copyright infringement simply because a determined reader decides to turn on best VPN to bypass the restrictions.
The decision sets a massive precedent. It confirms that copyright holders cannot point to the mere existence of VPNs to claim that a site’s security measures are completely ineffective.
More importantly for privacy advocates, the court pushed back strongly against the demonization of privacy software and cemented the legitimate status of VPN providers across the EU.
The Anne Frank controversy explained
The EU Supreme Court has just confirmed: Geo-blocking is the copyright holder’s problem, not the VPN’s. Providers are not responsible for users bypassing restrictions ⚖️ @torrentfreak https://t.co/fLwb5kYAy117 July 2026
The legal tug-of-war began when a coalition of Dutch and Belgian academic institutions published a free, scholarly online edition of Anne Frank’s manuscripts.
Because copyright laws are not fully harmonized across Europe, the legal status of the famous diary varies from region to region. In Belgium and about 60 other countries, the writings became publicly available years ago. But in the Netherlands, parts of the text remain protected by copyright until 2037.
To respect this territorial distinction, the publishers hosted the site in Belgium and used geo-blocking to prevent access from Dutch IP addresses. Visitors from the Netherlands were greeted with a message explaining why they could not access the site.
The Anne Frank Foundation, which holds the Dutch copyright, sued. They argued that because standard VPNs easily allow users to mask their true IP address and fake a Belgian location, the scientific website effectively communicated the protected work to the Dutch public.
The European Court of Justice ultimately rejected this argument. In its ruling, the court noted that while geo-blocking measures can inevitably be circumvented, “the possibility of such circumvention cannot in itself and in any event be a decisive factor in finding those measures to be inadequate and therefore ineffective.”
Why this matters for internet and VPN users
For regular internet users, “So what?” of this judgment is deeply reassuring. It confirms that using a VPN to encrypt your online traffic, hide your IP address, or bypass digital borders is a legitimate use of consumer technology.
The judges explicitly protected VPN companies from collateral damage in piracy cases, an issue that has sparked intense debate among European Internet providers and rights holders. The court specifically argued that the provider of a VPN or similar services is not responsible for users circumventing restrictions.
By placing the legal burden on publishers to maintain “state-of-the-art” digital fences rather than demanding absolute, impossible perfection, the EU has drawn a pragmatic line in the sand.
Publishers are not expected to build walls that cannot be hacked, and VPN providers are not responsible for the actions of users who climb over them. Ultimately, this ruling proves that the borderless Internet can still coexist with territorial copyright laws, provided everyone uses the right technical safeguards.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews and opinions in your feeds. Be sure to click the Follow button!
