If there was ever a chance that King Charles’ two sons could have reconciled at some point, Prince Harry seems to have blown it after his latest statement.
The Prince of Wales has not been in contact with his younger brother for almost four years and had avoided even the possibility of reuniting with him despite being under the same roof two years ago.
Harry had brought his wife Meghan Markle and their two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, to meet King Charles and Queen Camilla at Highgrove this month. Meanwhile, William and Kate held a bus program during that period.
The reunion itself did not come without hiccups with chaos and confusion surrounding the royal accommodation and security. Because of that, Harry also lost his phone hacking case against the DailyMail.
According to royal expert Emily Andrews, Harry’s statement after the verdict was another indicator of his “victim mentality” and how it “ensures it is ALWAYS someone else’s fault”.
She explained: “It’s the monarchy’s fault, the men in gray suits’ fault, his brother’s fault, his stepmother’s fault and even the British government’s fault. The fault is never his.”
It was already said that Prince William was “unhappy” with the Sussexes visiting, which is why he had “snobbed” him that I should not be near him. The Prince of Wales reportedly wanted Harry to take responsibility for his actions, which is why William remains so furious.
The expert said sources have claimed the relationship is “far from thawing”.
“He didn’t want to take any risk of seeing his younger brother – or Meghan Markle – on his home turf,” Emily said.
“A brutal showdown (which is what it surely would be) between the warring brothers is something that William would avoid at all costs.”
Prince Harry’s privacy statement
Harry said in his statement that he and his six claimants came to court “seeking justice and accountability” but they received “neither”.
“The fact that this court has chosen to dismiss them represents an inconsistency that is difficult to understand or reconcile with common sense or the evidence that was heard in the courtroom itself,” it read.
“It is a complete and obvious whitewash, but unfortunately not entirely unexpected. But the lengths to which the court has gone to exonerate the Mail is as shocking as it is completely unjustified.”
